of the have offeins opicion becewrth
affeties to
Ca ked
committed
acc
refpiceully pertifies action
of criminals
British Empire
ale
the.
hearsing part of the
ffence in
छ
found
teen way
& lette
(as I perume it dow)
in another,
practical reassity for lepilation. But
to detain
say it New Zealan
for perhaps 3 months pending
avruxl
с вычись
the
witter warrant may
wirler
If priture & be hand a
serive
delay
the alleges
So d'an inclined & Chunk
crimenal
test if
འ
telegrams
can be
han the full legal face of
ituris
be better.
heade W
a warrant
Katt hov 13
This sigh of the L. O. Opinion in
very satisfactory
ash? I think be made
A
Severally known throughout the Colmier-
I should think
that
Lender
the curar 2 legislate withe warrant to be haut
it we hardy be messing
the view of cabling.
bayr.c.34
16.17. V. c.118
by telegram.
421
If it were thought advisable
the Bill should be trees had in
415-31
the
the following from biz denabling principal Sears of late to send a telegram
& Min Office administering the Frd? of ain B54 porcession directing
a warrant for th
with con
him titlive
for the arrest of my
ffence
person charger
Went thereupon. Un Officer
If I o poreure i he istas
or
rent for the purpose –
dant for It purfree of preventing fraud
i mistake
H.M. by Order in Comeil
prontime to time prescribe
51. Nate What precautions the to observes
in transmitting the telegram (Wh as a metter
C
of practice shihe the [7.0] Cypher what he known to the God- the perfecthdays)
But
War
more serious question is that raised
If the inability than theme muntincess seaf to England for trial. This seems tiene to
oversight ask? be caref he simply
From Persons charged away
the place where, the offence
be sent basket-
Lys
committed la
2
being commetted
but the offence being
A
m
den. Ist? Mich
High seas that in negard ten-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.